Illinois Attorney Review Period: Standard Modifications and What to Negotiate By Elena Gallo, Senior Escrow Officer — Alltech National Title (Chicago)  Published: 2026-05-07 · 9-min read Illinois is an attorney state. Every residential real estate transaction requires a licensed attorney on each side — and the attorney review period is one of the few moments in a real estate deal where the terms can still move. Most buyers and sellers know the review period exists. Fewer understand what it actually covers, what modifications are standard, and where experienced Illinois attorneys push back hardest. This guide is written for real estate attorneys handling Chicago and Cook County closings. If you’re coordinating with a title company on your transactions, understanding how review period modifications interact with the title side of the deal will save time for everyone at the table. What the Attorney Review Period Is — and Isn’t Under Illinois law, after a real estate purchase contract is signed, each party has five business days to have an attorney review the contract. During that window, either attorney can: Approve the contract as written Disapprove the contract entirely, terminating the deal and returning earnest money Propose modifications to specific terms The review period does not pause indefinitely. The five-business-day clock starts from the contract date and runs regardless of holidays, except for federal bank holidays. If neither attorney acts, the contract is deemed approved. Common misconception: The attorney review period does not cover inspection-related issues. Inspection objections are handled separately — typically under a 10-day inspection contingency written into the contract. The attorney review period is for contract terms: price, dates, contingencies, representations, and conditions. Conflating the two timelines is one of the more common sources of confusion in Chicago closings. What Modifications Are Standard in Cook County Not all modifications are treated equally by the other side. After years of managing the title and escrow side of Cook County closings, here’s how we see the landscape: Modifications That Almost Always Go Through Without Friction Closing date adjustments. If the proposed closing date doesn’t work for financing or scheduling, a one- to two-week shift is typically accepted with no pushback. Most sellers prefer a confirmed close over a fight about timing. Earnest money escrow terms. Clarifications about where earnest money is held — with the listing broker, buyer’s broker, or a title company — when it’s released, and what conditions trigger a return are standard modifications. Both sides generally welcome clarity here; it reduces disputes at closing. Proration methodology. Illinois prorates real estate taxes in arrears, meaning the seller typically credits the buyer for their share of the prior year’s taxes. Specifying the proration rate (105% or 110% of the prior year’s actual tax bill is common in Cook County) avoids disputes at the closing table. Attorneys who nail this down in the review period save significant time on closing day. Title insurance commitment timeline. Requesting a specified number of days for title to be ordered and delivered — typically 15 to 20 days from contract — is standard. This protects the buyer’s attorney’s ability to review the commitment before the inspection period closes. Representations language. Tightening the seller’s representations about known material defects, active litigation, or HOA violations is standard. Sellers rarely object to what they already know; friction comes when a buyer’s attorney requests representations that go beyond what the seller can truthfully confirm. Modifications That Often Generate Counterproposals Extended closing dates. Requesting a 60-day close instead of a standard 30-day is sometimes necessary for financing, but sellers sometimes push back — particularly if they’re purchasing elsewhere with a contingency. Expect a counter or a request for explanation. Contingencies not in the original contract. Adding a financing contingency post-execution, or inserting a home sale contingency, will often generate a counter. These are not impossible to add, but they alter the risk profile of the deal from the seller’s perspective. Possession changes. Requesting seller possession after closing (a rent-back) or pre-closing buyer access for contractors both require careful drafting. Rent-backs, in particular, need clear terms on daily occupancy cost, security deposit, and liability — boilerplate is rarely sufficient in Cook County. Survey exceptions. Requesting a survey before closing, or modifying the survey objection process, is a legitimate move but requires coordination with the title company. Attorneys handling this should loop in their title contact early — the timeline for ordering a survey in Cook County runs 10 to 14 business days and needs to fit inside the closing window. Modifications That Almost Always Create a Fight Price reductions during attorney review. While technically permissible under Illinois law, attempting to renegotiate the sale price during the review period — absent a material disclosure that wasn’t in the original contract — will frequently result in disapproval by the seller’s attorney. The seller’s right to disapprove is symmetrical. Price reduction requests are better handled as part of an inspection response. Broad indemnification requests. Some buyer’s attorneys attempt to insert broad indemnification language covering any defect discovered post-closing, regardless of whether it was disclosed. Sellers’ attorneys reliably reject this. It converts the attorney review period into a warranty expansion rather than a contract review, and experienced sellers’ counsel recognize the pattern. How the Review Period Interacts with the Title Side From a title company’s perspective, the attorney review period is the window where we want to get moving on the title search. At Alltech National Title, we typically order the search as soon as we receive an executed contract — even before the review period has concluded — because a Cook County title search takes three to five business days on a standard residential property. Waiting until the review period closes before ordering title adds a week to the timeline and compresses the window available for clearing any issues that turn up. What attorneys should send us immediately at contract: Executed purchase contract (full document, not just the signature page) Buyer’s lender information — name, contact, loan type — because this determines whose title

Cook County Mechanics’ Lien Handling for Real Estate Attorneys By Elena Gallo, Senior Escrow Officer — Alltech National Title (Chicago) Published: 2026-05-03 · 8-min read A mechanics’ lien on a Cook County property is one of the most predictable closing-day disasters in Illinois real estate practice — predictable because the lien was filed weeks or months before the closing date, and disaster only because somebody on the file didn’t address it in time. This piece is for the Chicago real estate attorney who’s working a Cook County file with a mechanics’ lien on title and needs to know what their options are, what their title company should be doing, and what timing actually matters. This is part of the Chicago Real Estate Closing Playbook — a field guide for Illinois attorneys handling Cook County and surrounding-county title work. What is a mechanics’ lien in Illinois real estate? A mechanics’ lien is a statutory claim against real property granted under the Illinois Mechanics Lien Act (770 ILCS 60) to contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and laborers who have provided improvements to the property and have not been paid. The lien attaches to the property itself, not to the property owner — which means a defect filed against a prior owner’s renovation can still encumber title under the current owner. Illinois mechanics’ liens have specific filing windows: residential contractors generally must file a lien claim within four months of the last day of work; commercial filings have similar but distinct timing; subcontractors must serve a 90-day notice on the property owner before filing. These timing rules matter at closing because a lien that’s still within its filing window — even if not yet recorded — can be a future title risk that underwriters factor into commitment exceptions. For closing attorneys, the practical implication is: a clean title search today doesn’t fully clear the property of mechanics’ lien risk if there’s been recent contractor work. A thorough title commitment will note the timing exposure even when no lien is currently recorded. How is a Cook County mechanics’ lien different from other Illinois counties? Cook County mechanics’ liens follow the same Illinois Mechanics Lien Act statute as the rest of the state. What differs is the volume and operational pace: Cook County’s recording infrastructure handles a high throughput of lien filings, releases, and corrective recordings — and Cook County title examiners need direct working knowledge of how the system actually operates, not just what the statute says. Practical Cook County variances: Recording cycle. The Cook County Clerk (which absorbed the Recorder of Deeds in 2020) processes lien filings with electronic indexing that exposes them in title searches faster than some collar counties. A mechanics’ lien filed Monday morning may show up in Tuesday’s title search. Release recording. When a lien is satisfied, the release must be recorded — and Cook County rejects releases for technical defects (missing exemption stamps, wrong recording fees, formatting issues) at a non-trivial rate. A rejected release means the lien still appears on title until the corrected release records. Sub-tier visibility. Subcontractor mechanics’ liens are common in Cook County renovation and commercial files. The 90-day notice requirement creates a paper trail that’s discoverable in a thorough title search but missable in a fast one. For the closing attorney, the takeaway is operational: Cook County mechanics’ lien work depends on a title company that knows the local clerk’s office, monitors recording status post-submission, and surfaces sub-tier exposure proactively rather than reactively. When does a mechanics’ lien show up in a Cook County title search? A recorded mechanics’ lien appears in the title commitment as a Schedule B exception — specifically called out by recording date, claimant name, dollar amount, and a brief description. The title company will not insure clean title until the lien is released, paid, bonded around, or otherwise cleared to underwriter satisfaction. What’s harder is identifying mechanics’ lien risk that hasn’t yet matured into a recorded claim. Two scenarios closing attorneys see regularly: Scenario one — recent visible work. The seller has just completed a renovation, contractors were paid, and the owner believes the file is clean. But subcontractors haven’t been paid by the general contractor, and the four-month statutory window is still open. A title commitment may flag this exposure as a closing exception requiring contractor lien waivers (statutory contractor’s affidavits under 770 ILCS 60/5) or escrow holdback. Scenario two — historical work, recent lien. The previous owner had renovation work done, the prior closing was clean, but a subcontractor filed a mechanics’ lien against the property within the statutory window. The lien is now of record against the current owner — even though the current owner had nothing to do with the original work. In both scenarios, the closing attorney’s job is to coordinate with the title company on a clearance path: lien waiver, payoff and release, escrow holdback, or surety bond. The path depends on the lien’s recording status, the claimant’s posture, and the underwriter’s appetite. “Just not addressing all of the title issues that are in front of them in a timely fashion for closing.” — Adam Gurney, Gurney Law Group, on the most common preventable title-agent mistake (Title Agents Podcast Ep95) What can attorneys do at closing to clear a Cook County mechanics’ lien? There are five standard clearance paths, ranked roughly from cleanest to most workaround-y: 1. Payoff and recorded release. The lien claimant is paid in full and provides a written release of lien. The release records with the Cook County Clerk and the title company issues clean title. This is the cleanest method, requires the cooperation of the claimant, and works when funds are available. 2. Statutory contractor’s affidavit (770 ILCS 60/5). The general contractor provides a sworn affidavit listing all subcontractors and material suppliers and confirming they’ve been paid. Combined with subcontractor lien waivers, this can clear the underwriter’s concern about hidden sub-tier lien risk on recent work. The affidavit’s accuracy is on the GC. 3. Escrow holdback. A portion

Chicago Real Estate Closings with Adam Gurney, Esq. — Title Agents Podcast Ep95 Episode 95 of the Title Agents Podcast features a deep conversation with Adam Gurney, founder of Gurney Law Group — a Super Lawyers-recognized Chicago real estate attorney whose firm has handled thousands of Chicago, North Shore, and Western Suburb closings. Host Mo Choumil, founder of Alltech National Title, walks through how Illinois’s attorney-state model actually works in practice — what title agents need to understand, where deals break down, and what makes the difference between a vendor relationship and a real partnership. This is a working show notes recap with the strongest takeaways and direct quotes from the episode. Watch the full episode on YouTube below. Listen on: Spotify · Apple Podcasts · YouTube About the guest Adam Gurney founded Gurney Law Group in 2015 after acquiring his predecessor’s solo practice. He grew up in Shaker Heights, Ohio in a family of lawyers, started practicing real estate law in 2013 under solo practitioner Eric Miles, and took over the firm when Miles transitioned to a real estate broker role in California. Today, Gurney Law Group serves Chicago, the North Shore, and the Western Suburbs, with a heavy specialization in residential closings and a growing commercial practice. Adam is recognized by Super Lawyers — an honor reserved for the top 5% of Illinois attorneys through peer review — and is widely referenced in the Chicago real estate community as a partner-attorney for top-producing realtors and brokerages. Six key takeaways 1. The Illinois attorney review provision is the entire game Every Illinois real estate contract includes an attorney review provision: after the contract is signed, both parties have five business days to have an attorney review and either approve, cancel, or propose modifications. As Adam put it: “You think you have a contract in place. Congratulations. Signed contract. You’re offer one out of 20 offers. But now you still have to get through this attorney period and the inspection period.” Realtors negotiate the contract; attorneys take over from contract to closing. Brokers value attorney involvement because it keeps them out of the territory of practicing law — drafting modifications, negotiating legal language — where they could face liability. 2. Tax prorations are the most common attorney-review modification In Illinois, property taxes are paid in arrears, which means the seller owes the buyer a closing credit based on potential tax liability. As Adam explained: “It’s the attorney’s job to figure out what’s an appropriate credit. Sometimes we can’t agree on that, we just agree on an escrow agreement — we’ll wait for that bill to come out and address it after closing.” Other near-universal modifications: cure periods for default, appraisal language (the standard contract is silent on low appraisals), damages limited to earnest money to remove litigation threat, and post-possession terms when sellers stay in the property after closing. 3. The most common preventable title-agent mistake is sitting on issues Adam was direct about what trips up otherwise capable title agents: “Just not addressing all of the title issues that are in front of them in a timely fashion for closing. You might sit on things a little bit longer, or maybe you’re dealing with an estate or a divorce and you need court documents, or somebody might have a mortgage payoff but they might also have an IDA loan and you didn’t quite get that in time for closing.” The second mistake is the inverse of the first: attorneys relying too heavily on the title company without doing their own due diligence — and then both sides miss something at the last minute. 4. Title examiners aren’t lawyers, and that matters “Title examiners know title, but they don’t know everything about the law. The way a title examiner is going to look at a title issue sometimes might be different than the way an attorney looks at it. So the attorney oversight is crucial.” This is the structural reason Illinois requires attorneys at all — the law changes regularly, and a title examiner’s read of an estate, probate, or chain-of-title issue isn’t the same as a lawyer’s. Both perspectives are needed; neither substitutes for the other. 5. The “real estate broker title commission” model is the IDFPR’s current Wild West Chicago’s title industry has been working through a years-long question: can real estate brokers earn a piece of the title fee? The history Adam walked through: First, brokerages owning title companies (double-dipping the deal) Then, title companies finding ways to compensate agents directly Then, brokers being told they could be “title agents” if they did certain things “You start ending up with brokers doing title services and they don’t really know anything about title, and they end up with a lot of liability on their hands in the middle of some lawsuits. So now everybody is going back to the drawing board and trying to find creative ways to compensate brokers.” Adam expects more clarity from the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (IDFPR) in the next year, but for now the regulatory environment remains in flux. RESPA compliance is the floor, but RESPA-compliant doesn’t always mean operationally clean. 6. Service is the only real differentiator When Mo asked Adam how he stands out in a Chicago market full of real estate attorneys, the answer was direct: “Service, communication, reliability, consistency — especially in the busiest times. We just our thing is service, service, service. We deliver with service. We’re going to be always responding quick. Our paralegals have 10 plus years of experience. We never miss deadlines or closings. Our closings never get delayed because of us.” The same standard runs the other direction. When Mo asked what it takes for a title agent to graduate from “vendor” to “trusted partner,” Adam’s answer became the defining quote of the episode: “Service first and foremost — responsiveness, communication, fast title commitments. But if you really want to be a trusted partner: I need to know that when